The definition of cash, while
ostensibly straightforward – banknotes and coins – becomes increasingly
challenging when the demands for higher returns counteracts the obligation to
ensure adequate liquidity and the commitment to avoid losses.
As memories of the liquidity stress
and market dislocation triggered by the global financial crisis faded, the
range of financial instruments deemed acceptable in Australian cash products
broadened dramatically. This was also a time when investors grappled with the
challenges of outperforming attractive headline retail bank deposit rates.
Unfortunately, defining which instruments are truly cash equivalents is one of the most difficult tasks for modern corporate treasurers.
The Regulatory Dilemma
Globally, cash investors look to regulators and rating agencies to define and clarify suitable cash investment instruments and structures. This is especially true in the United States, European Union, and China, where the size and systemic importance of liquidity and money market funds (MMFs) made this a critical regulatory issue following the 2008 financial crisis.
These rules and regulations vary
from prescriptive, listing specific approved and unapproved instruments, to
abstract, outlining key sources of investment risk and limits to mitigate
them. Regardless of the regulator’s
philosophy, the ultimate goals remain the same – to ensure adequate liquidity
and minimise the probability of losses.
Over the past decade, global regulators have strengthened MMF
guidelines. They now demand higher levels of liquidity, impose tighter
investment limits and require increased diversification. For both retail and institutional investors,
these new rules have raised the standard of MMF investing while significantly
reduced the likelihood of funds suffering losses, albeit at the expense of
lower potential returns.
In contrast to detailed global
standards, Australian regulators have historically demurred the responsibility
to define cash or the suitability of various instruments for cash investments. The Federal government’s unlimited bank
guarantee during the Global Financial Crisis helped shelter the local financial
industry while a long history of self-regulation encouraged investors to create
their own definitions of cash and cash equivalents.
However, in 2018, a review of cash investment products by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) raised significant concerns about the level of volatility and risk in these products. Across the industry, the range of instruments and structures defined as cash varied enormously – as did returns. This created confusion for retail and institutional investors. In its subsequent report, APRA highlighted “examples in the industry where cash investment options appear to include exposure to underlying investments that would not generally be considered cash or cash-like in nature”1.
To encourage investment consistency and reduce the volatility of cash investment products, APRA concluded that “cash equivalents represent short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value”1.
Cash means security,
liquidity and return
The report signalled a tougher
regulatory stance and additional focus on questionable cash investments
styles. However, in the absence of
detailed regulatory guidelines and exact definition of liquidity and risk,
investor due diligence is still required to balance the need to preserving capital,
while ensuring suitable levels of liquidity and maximising returns.
Three key steps in this process
involve clarifying investment policies, creating well defined investment
objectives and implementing cash segmentation.
Firstly, using an investment policy
statement forms a solid foundation for cash investment decisions. A well written policy provides clarity,
instils discipline and allows the organisation to successfully navigate
shifting markets, changing regulations and evolving business needs.
Secondly, by defining short term investment objectives and the strategies for achieving them, an organisation can establish acceptable levels of risk, identify permissible investments and detail relevant constraints.
Finally, by putting cash into different segments, the organisation can optimise its investment choices – ensuring it has sufficient liquid cash to meet its daily needs while avoiding the opportunity costs associated with very high levels of liquidity and principal protection by diversifying across different types of cash investment depending on their level of liquidity, volatility, and diversification.
The new APRA definition of cash has
already prompted a significant reorganisation across the Australian cash
management industry with several instrument structures being avoided and more
conservative investment guidelines introduced.
This, combined with more due diligence and understanding of the
underlying risks by retail and institutional investors, should help the
industry create a safer foundation for future growth.
The Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA’s) overnight cash rate has been unchanged at a record low of 1.50% for a record 28-months (Exhibit 1A). Throughout 2018, the central bank’s meeting minutes and speeches suggested that rates remained appropriate — implying a broadly neutral policy stance — while hinting that the next rate movement would be higher, albeit with “no strong case for a near- term adjustment in monetary policy”(1) .
For most of 2018, forwards markets agreed with the central bank and were firmly pricing in future RBA rate hikes — but this has abruptly changed (Exhibit 1B) with the market now indicating a 50/50 chance of a rate cut in 2019. This rapid reversal could exert substantial influence on the central banks thinking with significant implications for money market and fixed income investors.
Stuttering growth engines
Historically, Australia’s twin engine economy has been a source of strength, with the combination of commodity exports and domestic demand helping the country avoid recession for a record-breaking 27-years. In the past half-decade, as mining infrastructure investment waned, a booming housing market — with prices jumping by 45% between 2012 and 2017 – replaced it as the key driver of economic growth.
However, the factors that triggered the housing surge — low interest rates, easy bank financing, limited supply and strong foreign demand have recently faded due to a combination of new macro prudential measures, higher commercial bank mortgage rates and tighter restrictions on foreign buyers. House prices (Exhibit 2A), building permits and new home sales have all fallen sharply, with negative repercussions for retail sales and consumer confidence.
Meanwhile, the well-publicized slowdown in Chinese economic growth and rising global trade tensions have raised the specter of lower demand for key Australian commodity exports including coal, gas and iron ore.
Consequences and conundrums
Throughout 2018, solid business sentiment, an improvement in capital expenditure intentions and a tight labor market — with strong hiring momentum and an up-tick in wage price pressures – encouraged the central bank’s belief that inflation would move higher — implying the need for future rate hikes. But weaker housing, sharply lower business sentiment and softer domestic demand are already impacting growth and are challenging the viability of the RBA’s optimistic 3.5% 2019 GDP forecast(2). The hawkish bias is also being questioned as the RBA has never hiked interest rates during a housing market downturn (Exhibit 2B).
The path of least resistance
Economic growth will likely slow in 2019, albeit from a previously robust level. However, fears of a property price crash are likely overdone: Low unemployment and low-interest rates suggest mortgage payments remain affordable and most homeowners still enjoy positive equity. Little mortgage borrowing was completed at the peak which was perceived by many as unsustainable.
Finally, even if the economy slowed faster than expected, the RBA has capacity to cut base rates if necessary and the government’s improved fiscal position has given it the ability to cut taxes or boost spending if required.
Given this backdrop, the RBA is likely to strike a more neutral tone in meeting minutes and revise down its 2019 GDP forecast while keeping base rates unchanged for the foreseeable future — further extending its record-breaking period of inertia.
For cash investors, this suggests that money market yield curves could flatten further, although the recent tight liquidity conditions represent an excellent opportunity to extend duration and lock in attractive longer tenor yields.
This annual survey seeks to evaluate the current and projected impact of fraud on the finance and treasury environment. Practitioners from all industries are polled on their experiences with fraud and on the range of controls, safeguards, and security practices employed to protect their financial assets and information.
Data related to bank account management and reconciliation practices is also gathered for a more comprehensive view of how various treasury operations impact security. This data is compiled annually and used to educate the industry as to how the fraud landscape is evolving, and how practitioners can better protect themselves and their organizations against attacks.
In this survey, treasury and finance professionals were asked questions on topics such as fraud experience, cyber risk management, bank account management and more.
https://financetreasury.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Tech.png800800Travis Davidsonhttps://financetreasury.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/FTA_Logo_new-blue-web.pngTravis Davidson2018-11-29 12:55:402018-12-05 15:15:15Download: PwC Working Capital Report 2018/19